Guess who blocked it?

Posted: July 7, 2006 in War crimes

Israelis razing a Palestinian Green House

gaza0628.jpg

thugs.jpg

Draft Resolution Demands Israel Quit Gaza

UNITED NATIONS — Acting on behalf of Arab nations, Qatar circulated a draft U.N. Security Council resolution Thursday demanding Israel end its offensive in the Gaza Strip and release the Palestinian officials it has arrested.

The draft faced immediate opposition from the United States and France, which called it unbalanced in its criticism of Israel. The document does not condemn the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier by Palestinian militants and makes no mention of Palestinian rocket attacks on southern Israel this week.

That raised the possibility that the United States, as a permanent member of the Security Council, would veto it. It has done so in the past when it believed resolutions condemning Israeli action did not include criticism of Palestinian actions.

Experts from the 15 Security Council nations were to meet later in the day to discuss the draft, but Bolton was not optimistic.

“I’m not sure there are amendments that we could propose that would make it into an acceptable resolution,” he said.

Israel launched the offensive last week in response to the June 25 capture of an Israeli soldier, 19-year-old Cpl. Gilad Shalit.

The resolution calls on Israel to “scrupulously abide by its obligations and responsibilities under the Geneva Convention,” and expresses its “grave concern about the dire humanitarian situation of the Palestinian people.

It demands that Israel “cease its aggression against the Palestinian civilian population” in Gaza, and also demands that Israel withdraw its forces immediately.

“We hope that the Security Council would rise to the occasion and would adopt a resolution and send the appropriate message to Israel to stop their aggression,” said Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian U.N. observer.

Mansour implicitly criticized the United States for its claim that the resolution was unfair. In a meeting on the issue last week, he said one speaker — a clear reference to the U.S. — had delivered a speech that was exclusively supportive of Israel.

“I think those who speak with that spirit, maybe, might be the last people to talk about one-sided draft resolutions,” he said.

Bottom line:

Just like it’s law that one cannot claim the Holocaust did not take place, soon it may become law that no one can criticize the Israeli thugs of war.

If Palestinians attack a bus full of Israeli soldiers, it is considered terrorism.

If Israelis attack and destroy the Palestinian civilian infrastructure, kill innocent civilians, it’s considered an “operation.”

How do you define justice?

excerpts from Associated Press Writer:

NICK WADHAMS

July 6, 2006, 5:40 PM EDT

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s